For Project Developers

The Investment Focus

Asset Classes and Location

  • Residential and commercial
  • Operational properties
  • In the EURO area



  • Project volume > EUR 10 million
  • Mezzanine and bridge loans
  • Refinancing


  • Land acquisition
  • Structural engineering development
  • Revitalization

Geographic Focus

  • Implementation of projects only in countries with the EURO as the official national currency (“EURO area“)
  • Focus countries are Germany and Austria

The Economic Background of Mezzanine Financing

High Equity Requirements for Project Developments

Equity has always been a central topic in the real estate industry. Project developers usually work on several developments in parallel, whereby the equity capital invested in the project is usually tied up until completion and successful marketing. This can lead to liquidity bottlenecks if the project developer wants to initiate a new project but does not have sufficient equity. As a result of the more restrictive lending policy under Basel III and banks’ increasing risk aversion, the equity requirements for project developers have risen, which may lead to financing gaps in the future.

Mezzanine Capital Strengthens Equity

Mezzanine capital fills this financing gap. This form of financing is usually, as the name suggests, located between equity and debt capital. Due to its equity-like character, mezzanine capital is usually classified by banks as equity capital and therefore facilitates the conclusion of classic project financing. There are also structures in which mezzanine capital represents the entire equity share from the perspective of the financing bank and therefore the project developer does not have to raise any capital of his own. With such an approach, however, the project developer must expect higher financing costs and may have to provide third-party collateral.

Flexible Form of Financing, where the Developer keeps Regular Control

Mezzanine capital is an extremely flexible form of financing. Depending on the investor’s strategy, it can either provide passive financing at an attractive intrest rate on the capital, or the investor can actively take over or arrange functions himself. In the first variant, project management remains entirely with the experienced developer. The second variant can be a great advantage for developers, especially in the case of projects in previously uknown markets, as the investor brings the missing expertise on board and thus strengthens the project not only on the capital level.

Against this background, mezzanine capital is regularly subordinated to the additional capital provided by banks. Due to the higher risk of payment default in the event of the borrower’s insolvency, the interest components in favour of the mezzanine capital provider are significantly higher than those of traditional bank loans. The lower the possible equity position and the marketing potential of the financed property, the higher the risk premiums will be from the mezzanine capital provider’s point of view.

This post is also available in: Deutsch